Study: Carbon Emissions of Pet Food Protein Sources

Kristina Voltin
Sep 18
9 min read

Updated: 5 days ago

Pet food production significantly impacts greenhouse gas emissions, largely due to the protein sources used. Animal-based proteins like beef and lamb generate high emissions because of methane production and land use, while plant-based options like soy and pea protein have a smaller footprint. Emerging alternatives, such as insect-based or lab-grown proteins, show promise for reducing emissions further but face scalability challenges.

Key takeaways:

Animal Proteins: High emissions due to methane, feed production, and land use.
Plant Proteins: Lower emissions but affected by farming methods like fertilizer use.
New Proteins: Potential for lower emissions but currently energy-intensive to produce.

To reduce your pet’s dietary carbon footprint, consider foods with low-impact proteins, locally sourced ingredients, and efficient processing methods. Brands like Loyal Saints are already leading with U.S.-made, freeze-dried options that combine quality with lower emissions. Small changes in pet food choices can help support both your pet's health and the planet.

The Climate Cost of Pet Food 🌍| Prof.Andrew Knight on Vegan Pets vs. Industry Resistance | CWN Clips

Common Pet Food Protein Sources

Pet food in the U.S. incorporates a variety of proteins, each with distinct nutritional benefits and sourcing considerations. Here's a closer look at the primary categories of protein used in pet food and their characteristics.

Animal-Based Proteins

Animal proteins are a staple in pet food, offering essential nutrients and flavors that pets enjoy.

Chicken: Known for its balanced amino acid profile and high digestibility, chicken is used in both fresh and concentrated forms.
Beef: Valued for its rich flavor and nutrient density, beef comes in a range of preparations to suit different pet needs.
Lamb: Often chosen for pets with sensitivities to more common proteins, lamb provides an alternative protein source.
Fish: Varieties like salmon, whitefish, and menhaden supply high-quality protein along with omega-3 fatty acids, which support skin, coat, and overall health.
Pork: Another animal-based option, pork offers a distinct flavor profile that appeals to many pets.

Plant-Based Proteins

Plant-derived proteins are increasingly common, particularly in grain-free or vegetarian pet diets.

Pea Protein: A concentrated source of plant-based protein, pea protein is frequently used in grain-free formulas.
Soy Protein: Known for its complete amino acid profile, soy is a versatile option, though it may pose allergy risks for some pets.
Legume Proteins: Lentils and chickpeas contribute both protein and dietary fiber, enhancing nutritional value.
Potato Protein: Aside from providing protein, potato protein also helps with texture and binding in pet food formulations.

New and Emerging Proteins

As sustainability and innovation become priorities, alternative protein sources are gaining attention.

Cricket Protein: A novel option that requires fewer resources to produce, making it an eco-friendly choice.
Mycoprotein: Derived from fungi, this protein offers a complete amino acid profile and is produced with lower environmental demands.
Cell-Cultured Meat: A cutting-edge development that replicates traditional meat flavors while aiming to reduce environmental strain.
Single-Cell Proteins: Proteins sourced from algae and yeast are being explored for their potential to utilize renewable energy and waste streams efficiently.

These diverse protein sources reflect the evolving landscape of pet nutrition, balancing the needs of pets with environmental and production considerations.

Carbon Emissions by Protein Type

Research highlights that the type of protein used in pet food plays a significant role in its carbon footprint. The environmental impact of different proteins varies greatly, making ingredient choices a critical factor in creating more sustainable pet food options.

Emissions Data Comparison

Animal-based proteins generally have a larger carbon footprint compared to plant-based ones. For instance, proteins from ruminants like beef and lamb are associated with higher methane emissions and require significant land and feed resources. Pork and chicken fall in the middle range of impact, while farmed fish emissions vary depending on the species and farming practices.

On the other hand, plant-based proteins - such as soy, pea, and other legumes - are produced with more efficient farming methods and use fewer resources, resulting in a considerably smaller environmental footprint. Alternative proteins, like those derived from insects or lab-grown sources, show potential for further reducing emissions, although production hurdles remain a challenge.

These variations highlight how production methods influence the overall environmental impact of different protein sources.

Key Research Findings

Studies reveal that animal proteins often dominate a pet food product’s carbon footprint, even when they account for a smaller portion of the recipe. This is due to their high resource demands. Larger-scale, efficient operations can mitigate some emissions, but factors such as farming techniques, feeding practices, and processing methods significantly affect the final impact.

For example, sustainably sourced soy has a much lower carbon footprint compared to soy linked to deforestation or land-use changes. Additionally, while energy-intensive processing methods like freeze-drying may increase emissions, they can improve digestibility and reduce food waste. This creates a trade-off between processing energy and the nutritional value provided, showing that the environmental impact of protein sources is a complex equation shaped by multiple factors.

What Drives Carbon Emissions in Protein Production

The carbon footprint of protein production depends on various factors, including production methods, resource requirements, and farming practices. Let’s break down the key contributors across animal, plant, and emerging protein sources.

Animal Proteins: Major Emission Drivers

Animal protein production is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions due to several interconnected factors. Land use is a significant contributor, as large areas are required for grazing and growing feed crops. This often leads to deforestation and the destruction of ecosystems that naturally absorb carbon. Additionally, the production of animal feed involves energy-intensive steps - cultivation, harvesting, processing, and transportation - all adding layers of emissions.

Methane emissions are another critical issue. Ruminant animals, like cows, release methane during digestion, and this gas has a much stronger warming effect than carbon dioxide. Even small amounts of methane can have a big environmental impact.

Manure management further compounds the problem. Under certain conditions, decomposing animal waste emits methane and nitrous oxide, both potent greenhouse gases. These combined factors make animal proteins a high-impact choice when it comes to carbon emissions, highlighting the importance of considering lower-carbon options for pet diets.

Plant Proteins: Agricultural Emissions

While plant-based proteins generally have a smaller carbon footprint than animal proteins, they come with their own environmental challenges.

One of the biggest contributors is fertilizer production and use. Synthetic nitrogen fertilizers require significant energy to produce, and their application in fields releases greenhouse gases. Similarly, irrigation systems can be energy-intensive, particularly when water pumping relies on non-renewable energy sources. However, techniques like drip irrigation can help reduce these emissions.

Transportation also plays a role. Ingredients sourced from local farms tend to have a smaller carbon footprint compared to those imported from far-off regions. By focusing on efficient agricultural practices and local sourcing, it’s possible to minimize the environmental impact of plant-based proteins.

New Proteins: Energy and Scalability Challenges

Emerging protein sources, such as those derived from fermentation, present unique challenges. These methods often rely on energy-intensive processes. For example, bioreactors require continuous power to maintain optimal conditions for temperature, mixing, and aeration. The construction and operation of fermentation facilities also contribute to emissions due to the need for specialized equipment.

Another factor is substrate sourcing. Whether the substrates come from conventional crops or repurposed waste materials, their production adds to the overall carbon footprint. Additionally, many of these production methods are still in their early stages and operate on a smaller scale. This limited scalability means higher emissions per unit of protein until efficiency improves.

While these challenges are significant, advancements in technology hold the potential to reduce emissions over time, paving the way for more sustainable options in pet nutrition. Understanding these nuances is essential when evaluating low-carbon protein sources for pet food.

Making Better Pet Food Choices

When it comes to reducing the environmental impact of pet food, looking at how proteins are sourced and processed can provide valuable insights. Below, we explore practical ways to choose pet food with a smaller carbon footprint while still meeting your furry friend's nutritional needs.

Low-Carbon Premium Pet Food

Choosing pet food that supports sustainability can make a meaningful difference. For example, freeze-drying is a method that helps preserve ingredient quality while using less intensive processing methods. Opting for products made with locally sourced ingredients can also cut down on transportation emissions. For pet owners in the U.S., selecting domestically produced pet food not only ensures shorter supply chains but also aligns with local environmental standards.

One standout option is Loyal Saints, a brand offering premium freeze-dried raw dog food made in the U.S. Their products feature human-grade, all-natural ingredients, delivering balanced nutrition with a reduced carbon footprint.

How Pet Owners Can Make a Difference

Pet owners play a crucial role in supporting sustainable practices by making thoughtful purchasing decisions. Start by checking ingredient labels for transparency and look for products with low-emission sourcing. While animal proteins are a key part of many dogs' diets, paying attention to how these ingredients are sourced and processed is essential for reducing environmental impact.

Another simple yet effective step is practicing portion control. By feeding your pet the right amount, you can cut down on food waste and reduce the demand for production, which helps lower emissions. Supporting brands that prioritize sustainability - whether through efficient manufacturing or eco-friendly packaging - can also encourage broader industry changes. Whenever possible, choose products that rely on local sourcing to further minimize transportation-related emissions.

Transitioning to a more sustainable approach to pet nutrition doesn’t happen overnight. Small changes, combined with careful attention to your pet’s health and nutritional needs, can significantly reduce their dietary carbon footprint while ensuring their well-being remains a top priority.

Conclusion: Climate-Conscious Pet Nutrition

Studies show that animal-based proteins produce more carbon emissions compared to plant-based options, making production methods and sourcing critical factors in reducing environmental impact.

By understanding these emissions, pet owners can choose products that support both their pets' health and the planet. The goal is to find options that combine nutritional quality with responsible sourcing. Practices like freeze-dried processing, domestic manufacturing, and transparent ingredient sourcing help lower a pet's dietary carbon footprint. These steps also set a strong example for the industry to follow.

Take Loyal Saints, for instance. This brand offers freeze-dried raw dog food made in the U.S. with human-grade, all-natural ingredients. By producing locally, they cut down on transportation emissions while adhering to strict quality standards.

Switching to more sustainable pet food doesn’t mean sacrificing quality or your pet’s health. Choosing products with clear sourcing and efficient processing allows pet owners to minimize their environmental impact without compromising nutrition.

As the pet food industry evolves, carbon emissions data will play a growing role in shaping responsible protein choices. Pet owners who care about their pets and the planet are leading this change, one meal at a time.

FAQs

How do the protein sources in pet food affect carbon emissions and the environment?

The environmental impact of the protein used in pet food can differ greatly, primarily due to the carbon emissions associated with each source. Beef and lamb rank the highest in carbon emissions because of methane produced by livestock and the resource-heavy nature of their farming. In contrast, chicken and plant-based proteins are much less taxing on the environment, offering a greener alternative.

Newer options like farmed fish and cell-cultured meats are also making waves for their potential to lower greenhouse gas emissions in pet food production. Opting for these more sustainable protein sources can reduce the environmental toll of feeding your pet and contribute to a healthier planet overall.

What are the pros and cons of using insect-based or lab-grown proteins in pet food?

Insect-based proteins in pet food bring several benefits to the table. They provide excellent nutrition, are easy for pets to digest, and are a more environmentally friendly alternative compared to traditional protein sources. On top of that, these proteins might help improve gut health, strengthen the immune system, and even assist with weight control. That said, there are some hurdles to overcome, such as getting consumers on board, addressing challenges in processing, and dealing with the general unfamiliarity surrounding this protein source.

Lab-grown proteins, like cultivated meat, also offer some exciting possibilities. They can help reduce the environmental footprint of pet food production, improve animal welfare, and deliver a consistent, safe source of protein for pets. These proteins may even support digestion and gut health. However, there are significant challenges, including high production costs, the complexity of scaling up the technology, and the need to win over skeptical consumers.

What are some ways to choose more sustainable pet food to lower my pet's carbon footprint?

If you're looking to lower your pet's environmental impact, consider choosing pet foods that use protein sources like poultry or plant-based ingredients. These options tend to generate fewer greenhouse gas emissions compared to beef or lamb.

You can also support brands that emphasize sustainability by responsibly sourcing their ingredients and adopting eco-conscious production methods. Making these adjustments can contribute to a greener lifestyle for both you and your furry friend.